July 19 Glimmerglass Opera: La Cenerentola

July 19 Glimmerglass Opera: ‘La Cenerentola’ an ensemble delight

Clever staging, superb singing yields laughs galore – and a whole lot more…

By David Abrams
http://cnycafemomus.com

Brother, can you spare a dime? Well, hold on to your change: Glimmerglass Opera’s new production of Rossini’s La Cenerentola, set here in Depression-era America circa 1933, creates a "New Deal" of its own – forging a stimulus package that generates outstanding individual and ensemble singing, snappy stage action and cleverly synchronized comedic interplay of characters that at times may have you wondering whether you’re watching opera or a Marx Brothers film.

Jack Benny once said that the secret of comedy is in the timing. Director Kevin Newbury’s clockwork precision in coupling the characters’ onstage actions to the words (and occasionally to the music) captures the buffa spirit of this production, drawing a steady stream of laughter from the audience that suggests Mr. Benny may have been on to something. Moreover, the motion of the characters and stage props appear to grow busier in-sync with the many Rossini crescendos (identical music phrases that repeat while increasing in volume with each successive repetition) that permeate the work. Of course, there’s more to this opera buffa than just comedy: La Cenerentola is a work full of graceful bel canto arias and striking ensemble numbers, and the opera contains Rossini’s most brilliant coloratura writing for mezzo-soprano and baritone.

Even if you’ve never seen the opera, chances are you’re already familiar with the plot: It’s the Cinderella (Cenerentola) tale with a few casting changes, and without the supernatural elements. The wicked stepmother is replaced by a just as wicked stepfather (the basso buffo role of Don Magnifico), and Cenerentola’s fairy godmother is now Alidoro, a philosopher and tutor to the Prince (who, in Newbury’s Depression-era setting is now a wealthy businessman). Gone are the pumpkin-turned-carriage, mice-turned-coachmen and glass slipper (here, a bracelet).

The role of Cenerentola, or Angelina as she is called in this opera, calls for a coloratura mezzo soprano ("coloratura" refers to the many rapid scalewise sections, or melismas, used to embellish and ornament the melodic lines). Julie Boulianne’s rich low and middle mezzo register produced all the warmth and mellow timbre more commonly associated with a contralto, yet her voice proved flexible enough to navigate the highly embellished duet with Don Ramiro (Un soave non so che) with grace and élan. Boulianne still had plenty left at the end of this three-hour performance to dazzle the crowd with the virtuosic Nacqui all’affanno, al pianto.

John Tessier, as Don Ramiro, possesses a charming lyric tenor whose clarity of focus remained intact throughout the afternoon. Using a fluid and seamless legato to great advantage, Tessier captivated the audience as he sailed effortlessly from pitch to pitch, even up to the high Cs in his signature second-act aria, Si, ritrovarla io guiro.

The great basso buffo role of Don Magnifico, sung and acted to near-perfection by Eduardo Chama, proved to be one of the high points of this production. Making his initial entrance in slovenly fashion wearing pajamas, an open robe and hair that would have embarrassed even Beethoven, Chama’s Magnifico proved less of a buffoon than a loveable (if not grumpy) authoritarian – along the lines, perhaps, of Ed Asner’s Lou Grant character from the classic Mary Tyler Moore Show. Try as I might, I just couldn’t dislike the guy – and I suspect many in the audience were relieved when his forgiving stepdaughter Angelina pardoned him at the close of the opera. After some slight pitch problems early in his signature aria Miei rampolli femminili, Chama went on to achieve a solid vocal presence and create a memorable character.

The second brilliantly executed comedic role in this production, and another effort likely to be remembered for years to come, was Keith Phares’ Dandini – valet to Ramiro who is all too eager to play the role of "prince for a day" at his employer’s request. Making his entrance sporting a slick three-piece suit, fur coat and greased-back coif, Phares resembled a character culled from a ‘30s style gangster movie.

The role of Dandini calls for a coloratura baritone – an uncommon vocal presence that, like the role of Angelina, demands great flexibility for the florid vocal embellishments. Phares’ handsome baritone was at once evident in his tongue-in-cheek aria Come un’ape ne’ giorni d’aprile, and his superb comedic acting spiced up the many ensemble numbers, particularly his second-act duet with Don Magnifico (Un segreto d’importanza). I was also impressed with the singer’s rhythmic skills in the second-act sextet (Siete voi?), where his razor sharp dotted-rhythmic figures were as accurate as any of the instruments accompanying the singers from the pit.

As Magnifico’s selfish and egocentric daughters, Glimmerglass Young Artists Jamilyn Manning-White and Karin Mushegain (Clorinda and Tisbe, respectively) combined unctuous stage presence with a relentless comic demeanor that never seemed to grow tiresome. Seeking the attention of the wealthy Don Ramiro, the obsequious sisters slinked, slanked and slithered upon every chair, couch and table within reach in a continuing effort to capture his attention. As Alidoro, the youthful looking Joshua Jeremiah (also from the Glimmerglass Young Artists program) was pleasant in voice but seemingly miscast in this production, lacking the looks and demeanor of a wise philosopher and advisor to the noble Ramiro.

Despite some pesky intonation problems in the overture, and a clearly tired trumpet section at the climactic conclusion to Act I, the Glimmerglass Opera Orchestra responded willingly to conductor Joseph Colaneri’s adventurous tempos and consistently produced crisply executed dotted-rhythmic figures throughout the performance.

As in Mozart’s Cosi fan Tutte, the ensemble numbers in Rossini’s La Cenerentola (duets, quintets, sextets) generally outshine the individual arias in this opera, and here’s where the production achieved its most satisfying musical results. Colaneri kept the singers tightly tethered to Rossini’s relentless tempos during the pernicious ensemble numbers, at times waiving his arms high into the air – such as during the rapid parlando passages in the first-act Quintet (Signore, una parola) and duet (Zitto, zitto: piano, piano) – in a mostly successful attempt to align the rapid-fire syllables of the singers to the beat of the music.

Newbury’s period motive is buoyed by Scenery Director Cameron Anderson’s three-piece set depicting Don Magnifico’s once-proud home, now falling into disrepair, barren except for a table and some chairs – and a bathtub (used by Magnifico to keep his beer cold). Later, the action moves to the splendor and elegance of Don Ramiro’s library, buoyed by props such as a large globe of the earth (which sadly squeaked audibly when spun), model ships and a mission-style table.

Jessica Jahn’s costumes successfully delineate the gap between the economic classes, from the downtrodden attire of the poor souls waiting at the soup line (placed in front of the curtain between each scene change), to the dazzling vintage evening dresses donned by Magnifico’s shapely daughters at the Ramiro mansion. Especially stunning was Angelina’s exquisite gown, which on Boulianne produced a look somewhere between Jean Harlow and Princess Grace Kelly.  D. M. Wood’s shadows and fog lighting effects at Magnifico’s house during the thunderstorm scene in Act II delivered a suitable imagery for not only the storm, but also Cenerentola’s depressing isolation at the hands of her loveless stepfather and stepsisters.

In spite of Newbury’s best efforts, the stage action in the second act sagged quite a bit – in part because the director had by that time exhausted ways to choreograph his principal characters and tux-donned servants, but mostly because Rossini had exhausted his musical ideas earlier in this three-hour opera. Still, this production is a veritable tour de force of synergistic buffa ensemble and is likely to be remembered for years to come.

Details Box:

What: Rossini’s La Cenerentola
Who: Glimmerglass Opera
When: July 19, 2009
Time: 2 hours 55 minutes, including one intermission
Call: Glimmerglass Box office: (607) 547-2255
Ticket prices: $48 to $130
Website: www.glimmerglass.org

Remaining performances: 

July

24, 27m, 31

August

4m, 8, 10m, 13, 15m, 17m, 21, 23m

m = matinees

Sunday-Tuesday Matinees at 2:00 p.m.*
Saturday Matinees at 1:30 p.m.
Evening performances at 8:00 p.m.
*except August 9, 16 and 23

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 7/20/2009 6:44 PM John Spradling wrote:
    As I was saying, a "...great service to the community". I wish we had Dave's complete reviews in the Post Standard all these years. What a delight!

    John
    Reply to this
  • 7/20/2009 9:02 PM David Rubin wrote:
    Director Kevin Newbury's updating of Cenerentola to the Depression era was poorly conceived and incomplete in its execution.

    Given that the plot turns on the confusion between the identity of the prince and the valet, and given this is 1933, has Mr. Newbury never heard of a camera? Or video? Further, other than the gag of bathtub gin (not beer, as reviewer Abrams notes), Newbury makes little of the updating, and the signs from the Chamber of Commerce about forcing unemployed men to move on were an unnecessary distraction.

    Doing greater damage was the fact that Newbury had no faith in the material Rossini provided. He felt it necessary to stuff every sight gag possible into the show. Over and over again he required his singers to roll globes around the stage, climb up and down ladders, and engage in other pointless business. It all distracted from the singing, and I can't imagine that the young singers themselves didn't find it all too much to negotiate.

    Newbury's poverty of imagination was clear when he used a black drop to frame almost 15 minutes of the comedy in Act 2. I imagined him saying at this point in rehearsals: "I haven't figured out what to do here, so let's do nothing at all."

    As for the singing, Mr. Abrams is closer to the mark, but not quite. Keith Phares has a Don Giovanni baritone (plus the sexy good looks) but not a Dandini baritone. He had trouble with the "shakes" required. The voice is not quite agile enough for Rossini. This is admittedly a very, very tough part, and Mr. Phares gave much pleasure, but next time I would like to hear him in Mozart.

    Ms. Boulianne in the title role at times simply disappeared from this production. When the Angelina is upstaged by the Clorinda (the striking blonde Manning-White), this is a bad sign indeed. Perhaps it was the direction. But for long stretches, this Cinderella was truly in the cellar. Her final aria, when she finally gets to shine, was routine, difficult as it is. The rest of the men contributed fine work.

    Conductor Colaneri kept things moving along at a fine clip.

    It is also worth noting that the audience was restrained in its response to cast and production team at the curtain calls, despite the fact that his was the opening. That is telling.

    All in all, it is a production well worth seeing, and it will give great pleasure to those who like their directorial touches layered on with a trowel. But by the conclusion, I was exhausted, and not by Rossini's ingenious and charming music. When Newbury is older and more experienced, he will understand that less is really more.
    Reply to this
    1. 7/20/2009 9:46 PM David Abrams wrote:
      This cafe invites and encourages honest discourse about the musical arts, including differences of opinion, and I welcome the comments of my friend and colleague (and oftentimes critic), David Rubin.  David and I attended the same performance yet arrived at vastly different opinions on what each of us saw and heard -- which is not at all uncommon among even the most knowledgeable of concert-goers.

      That having been said, here's my rebuttal, David.  I won't comment on your displeasure with Newbury's stage direction: Either you liked it, or you didn't.  Nor will I comment on your assessment of the quality of singing, which is a value judgment best left to each listener's tastes, experiences and individual perspective.  As to your comment about audience restraint at the conclusion of the performance, however, I must respectfully differ.  I witnessed a standing ovation, with great enthusiasm on the part of the crowd at the curtain calls for virtually every character taking a bow.  Of course, you were by your own admission "exhausted" at the conclusion of the performance: Did you hear what I heard? (which reminds me of a common phrase used by angry letter-writers who disagreed with my Post-Standard print reviews: "Were you at the same concert I was at?").

      Now on to the only thing that really matters: Was that beer or gin in that bathtub?  I could have sworn I saw a Bud Light label, but without my opera glasses I can't swear to it...

      Thanks for the thoughtful response, David.  I invite others to chime in on this thread -- before of after you see the Glimmerglass production...

      DA

           
      Reply to this
  • 7/21/2009 6:37 PM Kevin Moore wrote:
    This kind of excellent commentary, written by a serious, exceptionally knowledgeable writer, and one who is a first-class professional musician to boot, is invaluable to the central NY music lovers! I look forward to all of them! This has been missing from the central NY scene for far too long!
    Reply to this
  • 7/29/2009 9:08 PM David Abrams wrote:
    For those who interested in reading Heidi Waleson's WSJ review of Cenerentola, here's the link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203609204574316163211684316.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#articleTabs%3Darticle
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.