Oct. 24 Met simulcast: Aïda

Oct. 24 Met simulcast: Ancient Egypt conquers Ethiopia, modern cameras defeat singers in ‘Aïda’

Principals sing beautifully but acting crumbles under the scrutiny of close-up camera angles

By David Abrams
http://cnycafemomus.com

The Ethiopians weren’t the only ones to go down during the October 24 Metropolitan Opera HD Live Simulcast of Aïda Saturday – a few actors joined the carnage as well.

As high-tech cameras panned in on the (mostly unsuspecting) faces of principal singers, an audience completely invisible to them scrutinized every facial expression, lip movement and sweaty forehead. Spanning some 1,000 theaters across 42 countries, this phantom audience heard the same exquisite singing as their counterparts at Lincoln Center, but saw much more of the action, perhaps even an exaggerated view of the action, from Dolora Zajick’s deadpan expression (and mouth that opened only barely as she sang), to Johan Botha’s turgid stage presence and bizarre gaze that resembled a deer in the headlights.

What works for the Metropolitan Opera House crowd doesn’t necessarily work for the HD cameras. The brave new world forged by Peter Gelb with these HD simulcasts has changed the rules, and there’s no turning back: Singers must learn to act to the cameras as well as to the listeners sitting in front of them.

Violeta Urmana gets it. Her three-dimensional Aïda, buoyed by supple body movement and details of expression from face-to-toes, fashioned a heroine who appeared in-character when viewed from any angle and screen-size. Urmana’s muscular soprano, which strained early-on in the high register when pushed during her first-act signature aria, Ritorna vincitor, grew increasingly more flexible as the performance unfolded, reaching its zenith in the poignant O patria mia of Act III. Her command of pitch and dynamics in the tenderly phrased duet of resignation (Presago il core) during the final entombment scene with Botha, particularly in the high register, was sublime.

The only other acting that could withstand such scrutiny came from Carlo Guelfi as Amonasro, Aïda’s father (and disguised King of Ethiopia), whose commanding stage presence and daunting baritone generated sufficient poise and charisma to produce an image of royalty that belied the pauper’s clothes. Guelfi’s fanatical expression in Act III, when beseeching Aidä to choose revenge over love, is something I wish the Met audience could have seen up-close.

Until the final act, Dolora Zajick – as the Egyptian King’s jealous daughter, Amneris – brought little life or dimension into a role she had performed some 250 times earlier (the drama I experienced was limited to trying to reconcile her beauty of tone with a mouth that barely opens wide enough to shape her vowels). The celebrated mezzo-soprano came alive however in Act IV, and rather convincingly, when she grasped the reality of the death sentence imposed on her would-be-lover, Radamès (Ohimè, morir mi sento). I suspect that Zajick’s expressionless face was not so much an issue with the live Met audience as it was to those privy to the camera-work, but it sure dampened my spirits. Still, her voice remains in fine form and, at some 60 years of age, shows little signs of surrender to the march of time.

As an actor, Johan Botha’s Radamès was no more convincing than Zajick. Botha’s movement across the stage was stodgy and inflexible (I much preferred to watch the props), and his facial expressions appeared detached from the dramatic action unfolding before him. The singing was not disappointing, and although Botha’s voice tended to push and sacrifice some degree of flexibility early on in the first-act Celeste Aïda, his dramatic tenor held firm throughout the performance, at times soaring high above the orchestra. Especially impressive was the end of Botha’s final duet, in octaves, with Urmana (O terra, addio).

Of course, there’s more to grand opera than acting and singing. Extravaganzas such as Aidä are largely about spectacle, and there was much to love in this grandiose revival of the original 1988 production by Sonja Frisell – with monster sets designed by Gianni Quaranta depicting eye-busting visions such as the colossal palace of the Egyptian King at Memphis that may have topped anything done by Cecil B. DeMille.

Dada Saligeri’s handsome period costumes for the priests, soldiers, prisoners, slaves (and yes, horses) captured the essence of ancient Egypt, although occasionally evoking some unfortunate comparisons to contemporary culture (I could have sworn I saw the High Priest Ramfis – or someone dressed exactly like him – in several episodes of Star Trek, and the penguin-shaped hat sported by the Egyptian King during Act II looked like a gold-plated bowling pin).

Due to the many dance episodes endemic to grand opera, Aïda is as much an aural spectacle as it is visual. The Met Orchestra, under the direction of Daniele Gatti (substituting for the ailing James Levine), was in magnificent form throughout the performance, from the somber pianissimo opening entrance of Aïda’s theme in the violins to the brassy fanfares announcing victory over the Ethiopians during Act II. A number of strikingly beautiful and well-executed solo and concertante wind passages in Act III complemented the heroine’s mournful O patria mia.

Alexei Ratmansky’s choreography of the dance numbers during Act II was visually appealing, save for the anachronistic pas de deux at the opening of the act that seemed to be rooted more in Disneyland than Ancient Egypt. The overhead camera work on the larger dance scenes recalled the glory days of Busby Berkeley.

A well-prepared Met Chorus, under the watchful eye of Donald Palumbo, was right-on with its dotted-rhythms in the Act I Su! Del Nilo al sacro lido! during the Egyptian King’s call to battle, and all but took the house down in its glorious Gloria all’ Egitto in Act II. Especially impressive were the chorus’ whisper-soft a capella passages, although it must be said that the offstage parts tended to sag well below the pitch dictated by the orchestra – a problem that also plagued the offstage priestess chant (Possente Phtha!) at the end of Act I.

Sadly, there were no elephants in this production. Considering the expense of the lavish sets and human resources, the Met’s dollar will stretch only so far – and elephants don’t work for peanuts…

Details Box:
What

: Verdi’s Aïda, Simulcast Live in HD
When: October 24, 2009
Who
: Metropolitan Opera
Time
: 4 hours, including 2 intermissions
Where:
Metropolitan Opera House, New York
Cast: Violeta Urmana,
Dolora Zajick, Johan Botha, Carlo Guelfi
Next simulcast
: Puccini’s Turandot. 1 P.M. Saturday, Nov. 7

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 10/27/2009 11:06 PM Arthur Krieck wrote:
    This is the weakness of operatic training worldwide, and the "brave new world" of HD simulcasts shows it with ultimate clarity. Opera is drama and the rudiments of acting and stagecraft MUST be a big part of operatic training. Sadly, this is not the case for most opera singers, and so their
    "acting" is limited to "indicating" emotions, gestures that are either meaningless or overdone, no knowledge of basic stagecraft skills like learning how to use props, little understanding of how to interact with another actor in a scene...and startlingly for supposedly musically trained performers, singers who DON'T LISTEN to each other onstage!

    This in spite of the fact that Stanislavski's inspiration, the model that inspired him and led to the codification of his "System" (which has been largely misunderstood and mangled in its American translation, the "Method")...was Feodor Chaliapin, an opera singer who also possessed a great natural acting talent. Stanislavski observed what Chaliapin did instinctively onstage and analyzed it, turning it into a "system" of training for actors. This is all largely ignored by operatic training worldwide and by opera directors. Singers think this is not important and ignore it, leading to the wooden, passionless playing we see so much of on opera stages today.
  • 10/28/2009 11:35 AM Wayne Myers wrote:
    The Met's "Live in HD" series underscores the incompatibility of acting in the monstrous Met space and for the camera and difficulties in serving a film audience and opera house audience at the same time. As a rule, the "less" one acts for the camera, the stronger the performance will be--generally. But in live performance, the Met space is acutely antithetical to any attempt to achieve intimacy. As music historian Joe Horowitz has noted, the Met made a fatal planning error with the scale of its Lincoln Center home. It was an anachronism from the start--an evolutionary throwback compared to the size of modern opera houses being constructed at that time for the new intimacy. Having to serve the requirements of two vastly different performance mediums, live performances, especially Met live performances, too large for film are inevitable, as is the unflattering illuminating of beads of sweat under stage lights, etc. To bring off a successful live performance of an opera in a house such as the Met's for film may be the hardest work of all, but as the release of DVDs such as ROH's "La Fille du Regiment" with Natalie Dessay shows, it can be done. The performances achieved a balance between stage and screen performance suitable for live opera on film.
  • 11/22/2009 6:32 PM Ray wrote:
    As an actor, I'm glad to see Acting discussed at all in relation to Opera. I was bored to death at the HD of "Aida". Well, not to death, but I actually slept through the Triumphal Scene. Granted, Urmana was the only one tolerable visually, but her singing is not in a class with the other two. I enjoyed the broadcast on sirius, which leads to the conclusion... Three fat people in a love triangle is best left to the imagination.
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.